tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10178279.post4023119972784809758..comments2024-03-28T05:13:13.921-04:00Comments on Books, Inq. — The Epilogue: Today's Inquirer reviews ...Frank Wilsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18410473158808750903noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10178279.post-41886852374300775022011-06-22T07:18:56.832-04:002011-06-22T07:18:56.832-04:00Thanks for your reviews I'm looking forward fo...Thanks for your reviews I'm looking forward for your updates.fashion suitshttp://www.mensusa.com/tools.aspx?id=130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10178279.post-45974506193750326822008-03-23T12:36:00.000-04:002008-03-23T12:36:00.000-04:00Hi Frank,I was puzzled (mystified?) by that statem...Hi Frank,<BR/><BR/>I was puzzled (mystified?) by that statement in Carlin Romano's article too. Why would he say that? A check at <A HREF="http://onelook.com/?w=mysticism&loc=scworef&scwo=1&ls=a" REL="nofollow">Onelook.com: mysticism</A>, and we have this:<BR/><BR/><I>Quick definitions (<B>mysticism</B>)</I><BR/><BR/><B>noun:</B> obscure or irrational thought <BR/><B>noun:</B> a religion based on mystical communion with an ultimate reality<BR/><BR/>Context urged me to use the second definition. But, I believe Carlin wanted the first definition, the second almost necessarily stirring one to philosophical debate and inquiry.<BR/><BR/>But of course, until Carlin agrees, I may be dealing in mysticism myself.<BR/><BR/>Yours,<BR/>RusRus Bowdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08412920154921512774noreply@blogger.com