tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10178279.post7198242312695831721..comments2024-03-28T05:13:13.921-04:00Comments on Books, Inq. — The Epilogue: History alive ...Frank Wilsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18410473158808750903noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10178279.post-32534170416733680502009-08-25T17:50:21.329-04:002009-08-25T17:50:21.329-04:00Thank you for sharing this one, Frank. It occurs t...Thank you for sharing this one, Frank. It occurs to me how different our news apparatus is now (with so many cable new channels, Internet news sites, journalists blogs, etc.). Let us pray that we never have an incident similar to the JFK assassination, but just imagine how differently any such incident would be "reported" and communicated. I think that the coverage would not necessarily be an improvement since we and our "relationship" with the news media is so very different now. As I think about JFK's murder and Cronkite's reporting, I somehow do not recall any other news coverage; certainly the other two (?) networks had coverage, but why is it that so many people remember only Cronkite in connection with the news bulletin? That is probably a question without an answer--more like a random thought.R/Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07791522136032565027noreply@blogger.com