All of this could easily be mischaracterized as a defense of Card, his
art, and his politics. It’s nothing of the sort. I find the tone of
Card’s essays smug and off-putting, and I vehemently disagree with
nearly all of his opinions. His stance on homosexuality—its causes, its
social consequences, even its proper status in the Mormon Church—would be laughable if it weren’t insulting and destructive. Nevertheless, I respect and admire Ender’s Game,
and I try to judge Card’s books (and his arguments) on the basis of
their relative merits. That’s because I believe in a principle—one that
distinguishes between an artist’s art and his character, and resists
reducing human beings to a political position or a religious faith. It
is a difficult principle to embrace: demanding of empathy, suspicious of
oversimplification, and inhospitable to righteous anger. But the effort
is worth it.
As Frank
noted a few years ago, Card himself wouldn't necessarily agree.
No comments:
Post a Comment