Thursday, March 20, 2014

Getting to know what words do …

… English teaching: Johnson: Talking past each other | The Economist. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

… English departments should require an interdisciplinary class with linguistics on the grammar of the English language. Literature departments should cultivate more scholars who focus on language itself rather than literature alone. (Their academic research could focus on historical changes in English; how literary writers employ grammar devices; data-driven analysis of great English writing; the use of dialect and non-standard English; and so on.) In exchange, linguistics departments should require their students to take an English department class, to let those scientifically minded students broaden their horizons with the close reading of literary texts. 
Not a bad idea, but teaching grammar in grade school the old-fashioned way would be better. There are some things you learn better when you are younger. The value of  something like The Elements of Style, which I read right after I graduated from high school, is not that it's the last word on the subject — it isn't — but that it puts the subject into focus, so you can find your way around. As Robertson Davies said, it teaches you how to make the verbal equivalent of a chicken coop. But if you aim to build a house some day, starting with a chicken coop isn't such a bad idea.

1 comment:

  1. I never paid attention to grammar, couldn't get the concepts or was too mentally lazy, or something. I picked up what little knowledge I have of how to write from reading, reading constantly and voraciously. I wish I had paid attention to grammar though and it had been taught in the old fashioned manner -- because even in the 60's and 70's the "new" school fashion was in around here, which involved "concepts" that might have made grammar a little more confusing to me; nothing wrong with a drill or two.

    ReplyDelete