Hmm

… Harvard and Ronald Sullivan, why Harvard was basically right - Marginal REVOLUTION. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

While it’s obviously true that all criminal defendants have a right to an attorney, it’s equally obvious that criminal defendants don’t have a particular right to Ronald Sullivan’s services.

It should also be obvious that Sullivan is entitled to offer his services to whomever he chooses. There is also the matter of Weinstein's presumed innocence. Harvard seems to have presumed his guilt. (I know, I know. But Constitutional considerations should still prevail).