… Syria’s biggest vulnerability was that it had no recent record of recovering from turmoil. Countries that have survived past bouts of chaos tend to be vaccinated against future ones. Thus, the best indicator of a country’s future stability is not past stability but moderate volatility in the relatively recent past. As one of us, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, wrote in the 2007 book The Black Swan, “Dictatorships that do not appear volatile, like, say, Syria or Saudi Arabia, face a larger risk of chaos than, say, Italy, as the latter has been in a state of continual political turmoil since the second [world] war.”
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Illusory stability …
… Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Gregory F. Treverton | How to Predict State Failure | Foreign Affairs. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Many problems in the region were caused by the British, French, and the artificial boundaries and Zionist concessions that came out of the Treaty of Versailles.
ReplyDeleteQuite true. But such changes are part of the order of things to which the wise adapt. The unwise keep fighting over them
ReplyDelete