Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Hmm ...

... Art and the Limits of Neuroscience - NYTimes.com. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

What we do know is that a healthy brain is necessary for normal mental life, and indeed, for any life at all. But of course much else is necessary for mental life. We need roughly normal bodies and a roughly normal environment. We also need the presence and availability of other people if we are to have anything like the sorts of lives that we know and value. So we really ought to say that it is the normally embodied, environmentally- and socially-situated human animal that thinks, feels, decides and is conscious. But once we say this, it would be simpler, and more accurate, to allow that it is people, not their brains, who think and feel and decide. It is people, not their brains, that make and enjoy art. You are not your brain, you are a living human being.


What stymies a purely materialistic view of things is that you can't have an object without a subject. The object is something that a subjet perceives. So was the world here before there was any sensory being to notice it? Not in any way that would make sense to us.  In fact, we can only imagine what it was like then.

No comments:

Post a Comment