The shrill tone of the rhetoric—”a glorified Starbucks,” “a vast Internet café,” “cultural vandalism”—suggests an emotional response that goes beyond disagreement over policy. Practically every critic has a story to tell about his or her personal encounter with the city’s most precious repository of culture; every story conveys the danger of defiling something sacred. Those responses deserve respect. Some of the criticism may be valid. But aside from the merits of the arguments, I think it important to recognize that the polemics are driven by passions that run deep in the city’s collective sense of self.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Controversy …
… In Defense of the New York Public Library by Robert Darnton | The New York Review of Books. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment