Oh come on. Really? Like the Enterprise Institute isn't heavily invested in the outcome they predict?
Seriously, this is a Consider The Source moment. The rhetoric here is like a butcher trying to convince the steer that the slaughterhouse is a good idea. LOL. It's predicting a desired outcome, not a certin one. Nostradamus is as good an oracle as wishful thinking; which is to say, not very.
For a sermon to the faithful, it's not bad, but it could use some fact-checking. Specifically, a selective use of statistics, and studies sponsored by those who want a certin outcome. In other words, bad science. Inductive reasoning.
Oh come on. Really? Like the Enterprise Institute isn't heavily invested in the outcome they predict?
ReplyDeleteSeriously, this is a Consider The Source moment. The rhetoric here is like a butcher trying to convince the steer that the slaughterhouse is a good idea. LOL. It's predicting a desired outcome, not a certin one. Nostradamus is as good an oracle as wishful thinking; which is to say, not very.
For a sermon to the faithful, it's not bad, but it could use some fact-checking. Specifically, a selective use of statistics, and studies sponsored by those who want a certin outcome. In other words, bad science. Inductive reasoning.