Saturday, April 06, 2013

I coulda been a scientist …

 Great Scientists Don't Need Math - WSJ.com. (Hat tip, Julie Chovanes.)

Ideas in science emerge most readily when some part of the world is studied for its own sake. They follow from thorough, well-organized knowledge of all that is known or can be imagined of real entities and processes within that fragment of existence. When something new is encountered, the follow-up steps usually require mathematical and statistical methods to move the analysis forward. If that step proves too technically difficult for the person who made the discovery, a mathematician or statistician can be added as a collaborator.

1 comment:

  1. Then we have nothing to worry about in the US, do we? It is probably fair to say that it is possible to over-mathematize a topic---James Gleick quotes Richard Feynman on another physicist's work, roughly "there sure are a lot of equations". But Feynman was very proficient at mathematics, and there is always the example of Newton...

    ReplyDelete