What motivates me, rather, is a love for useful and beautiful tools that are well-designed to perform specific functions, and a dislike of seeing them used in a way that ruins them. If we misuse a phillips screwdriver (and note that I have no objection to dropping the initial majuscule on “Phillips”) to punch holes in a wall or to chip bits off of rocks, we run the risk of blunting it in such a way that we lose the ability to use it as a phillips screwdriver. Likewise, when we use “decimate” (a term that bears its etymology and associated history on its face) to mean “destroy most of” (something we have many perfectly good synonyms for already – including “devastate,” which is probably what people were aiming for when they started misusing “decimate”), we undermine our ability to use it to mean “destroy ten percent of” – a very specific meaning for which no other term exists (and we also help to render the historical use of the term unintelligible).I think something that Lord Falkland said applies: “When it is not necessary to change, it is necessary not to change.”
Monday, July 22, 2019
Hmm …
… Confessions of a Grammar Nazi | Policy of Truth. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Language is alive. It is always changing.
ReplyDeleteLike the climate.
ReplyDelete