Monday, November 11, 2024

Rachel Cusk

 


I've now finished the third of Rachel Cusk's "Faye" novels, Transit. And let me say at the start: this novel, like the others in the trilogy, is excellent: I mean absolutely excellent. (I read the novels out of order.) 

Part of what I liked so much about Transit -- and Outline and Kudos -- is that it occupies a rare literary space: it auto-fiction without the narcissism. It is a book about questions: about how we pose them, and what we expect to hear or receive in response. 

If Cusk is the main character in this experiment, that seems secondary: because her role in the novel is primarily to listen, and to endow conversations -- as I've written on the blog before -- with a universal quality. That is magic of Cusk: her ability to transcend the banal, to mold it into something great, with a lesson to impart. 

What Transit is about exactly is not the point: you might say it is a novel about transitions, about spaces, about homes, about London, about loss. And all of these themes are indeed addressed. But they're explored less by way of character, and more by way of memory, discussion, and reconnection.

In Transit -- more than in Outline or Kudos -- Cusk orients her reader: she is in London; this is her builder; his name is X; he is this way or that. But now having read a few of Cusk's novel, I know that these details are less important than what the builder recounts to Cusk and how she structures those remembrances. This is a novel in which each section, each chapter, represents the transformation of the ordinary into something weighty, something transcendent.

It had been a while since a trilogy like this caught my attention, but these three novels are exceptional: they demand thought and reflection, and a new way -- it is no exaggeration -- of processing literature. 

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:05 PM

    I loved those novels. I can't imagine reading them out of order. I read an excerpt from her latest in the New Yorker but it was too tricksy for me - I think her intelligent attention directed at existence is what she excels at; as you say, "the transformation of the ordinary". The part of her new novel I read in the New Yorker was more conceptual. On the other hand, the novel in its completed state has just won a big prize so somebody liked it. I don't know if you've read her early novel about a girl who takes a job as a live-in childminder, overlooking the fact that she needs to be able to drive (she can't) - it is very very funny in parts. ZMKC

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for this great comment!

    ReplyDelete