... you come upon an article that explains something you've been trying to get across better than you ever really could. Such, for me, is Adam Wolfosn's Survival of the Evolution Debate:
"... if the point of Darwinism is to refute the existence of God, as these popularizers tend to claim, then it too would have to be excluded from the science curriculum. The Supreme Court, after all, has ruled that the state must remain neutral between religion and irreligion. In their more heated polemics, Darwin's popularizers paint themselves into this intellectual corner."