Wednesday, October 08, 2008

The argument from authority ...

... remains unscientific: Uncertainty. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

Argument and puzzlement are not, of course, things that professional communicators of science like very much. They like science stories to be black and white, cut and dried, and concentrate on undisputed facts, advertising great discoveries while minimizing the years of effort and false starts needed to get there. But real science doesn’t work like that – it depends on creativity, questioning, and excursions into the unknown – an intuitive grasp of the fantastic.

Read the whole thing - carefully. It's excellent.
I think we would all do well to cultivate a greater sense of uncertainty. Too many of us tend to be more certain of many things than one ought to be of just about anything.

7 comments:

  1. This is indeed an excellent article. It succinctly describes most of my own questions and objections in the current science vs. religion debates. It also demonstrates how these current arguments misrepresent both science AND genuine faith. This is a real keeper. Thanks for sharing it with us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:37 PM

    I used to be indecisive. But now I'm not so sure...

    ReplyDelete
  3. On the other hand, Ernest ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ah, just what I've been looking for, the conclusive article on uncertainty.

    Seriously, thanks for pointing me there. It's been a while since I visited the site.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Heisenberg prolly rules . . . ?

    [*ouch - who jes' kicked me in the shin?*]

    Love, Yer Virtual-Kurtual Gödel Nödel
    p.s. See? That's what ya git for incorriging me!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:56 AM

    Kilroy Was Here.
    Heisenberg might possibly have been somewhere in the vicinity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ernest scribbled:

    > Kilroy was here.<<

    You sure about that? Was he moving or did time stand still in said vicinity? 'Fess up!

    ReplyDelete