There can be many interpretations of reality, but not all of them can be true. Those who thought the Sun orbits the Earth had one interpretation; they were proved wrong.
Not exactly. The sun does appear to orbit the Earth and, prior to determining that this appearance is misleading as to the actual relation of Earth and Sun, there was no reason to think otherwise. That the appearance had come to play a vital role in various official outlooks complicated matters.
… the mere fact that there are multiple interpretations of the world does not threaten the idea that some are true and some are false. The existence of a plurality of viewpoints is perfectly compatible with believing in truth in the Aristotelian sense. But to believe in truth in this sense is not to believe that there is only one truth about the world; there may be many distinct true interpretations, just as there may be many false ones. Believing in truth does not mean believing there is only one big story or meta-narrative, to use Jean-François Lyotard’s term. Nor does it mean believing in certainty: we can obtain the truth about a given subject without being certain of it.
Neither does it exclude the possibility that there may in fact be "only one big story or meta-narrative." That is one of the things we may not be able to be certain about.
Although [Caputo] sometimes suggests that postmodernism is a response to some specific historical events – the genocides of the twentieth century, for example – and he is happy to talk about “our postmodern times”, in fact his considered view is that “modern and postmodern are best taken as contrasting styles of thinking we could find anywhere, any time”. This seems right: the idea that conflicting perspectives on the world threaten monolithic styles of thinking is at least as old as the Protagorean claim that man is the measure of all things. The reasons Caputo gives for his postmodernism are ones that could have been given at pretty much any time in the history of human thought. So it is preferable to think of postmodernism as a decision to talk and think in a particular way, rather than a discovery about thought or the world. It is an attitude to the world that embodies an epistemic caution and scepticism about any attempt to say (in Caputo’s phrase) “what is finally going on”.
Then postmodernism isn't even modern, let alone postmodern.
No comments:
Post a Comment