Poe’s great tales turn on guilt concealed or denied, then abruptly and shockingly exposed. He has always been reviled or celebrated for the absence of moral content in his work, despite the fact that these tales are all straightforward moral parables. For a writer so intrigued by the operations of the mind as Poe was, an interest in conscience leads to an interest in concealment and self-deception, things that are secretive and highly individual and at the same time so universal that they shape civilizations. In Pymand after it Poe explores the thought that reality is of a kind to break through the enthralling dream of innocence or of effective concealment and confront us—horrify us—with truth.
Friday, January 16, 2015
A dreadful unity …
… On Edgar Allan Poe by Marilynne Robinson | The New York Review of Books. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There are some especially smart observations in that essay on how Poe used his aesthetic sense to investigate the universe, which I think is one of the purposes of writing. Today, anyone who writes in an idiosyncratic manner is instantly shut down, perhaps because contemporary readers no longer have the tolerance for vaguely heavy lifting. Adam Thirlwell is one of the few young writers probing into stylistic phenomenons and he gets a lot of shit for it.
ReplyDelete