Thursday, June 26, 2014

Weigh in, folks …

… beyond eastrod: RT returns to work at Beyond Eastrod . . . but I need "marching orders" from you . . .



I like all of the topics, but certainly find No. 16 intriguing.

2 comments:

  1. Well, Frank, as a clue and preview to my discussion of No. 16, I invite you to consider this: Which _Hamlet_ (or which portion(s) of _Hamlet_) shall we discuss? As I read the play, it has become a complicated accretion -- much like a myth in a culture -- so that is difficult now to find and discuss the original core. Moreover, superficial adoration (and over-rating) of a myth without understanding exacerbates the problem. Is that enigmatic enough as a clue to my iconoclastic thinking? More later.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is interesting, because you are right: which Hamlet are we talking about?

    ReplyDelete