Thanks for this article. It's a good one that I had not read yet, as I have been delving into AI for the past few weeks, filling the hole in my brain, similar to how I filled the hole in my heart with Mary 10 years ago. Indeed, I even got an IBM credential or "badge": Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals.
The latest news on bad use of AI is the artificial Biden voice telling voters in NH not to vote. The techie who released it worked at OpenAI, and got fired for it. The problem was that the prankster had to be fired after some damage had been done. I listened to the audio and it was poorly done in both faking the voice and in being unconvincing. Yet and still, these "problems" with inaccuracy in AI are already being addressed, such that I was surprised how bad the not-so-deepfake of Biden was done. (Maybe another reason to fire the not-so-techie prankster?) These fake voices can be better charged with different emotions and such, just for the asking.
That hole in my brain, about AI, may be something others are sensing, a sort of falling behind. Their courses are free. Here's the link: IBM SkillsBuild. I received a badge in Mindfulness there, maybe my next will be CyberSecurity.
On the use of LLMs or Large Language Models, I conversed with ChatGPT 3.5 (not the much advanced ChatGPT 4.0) on Trumps' book Crippled America. Anything that ChatGPT or any other LLM reports that is false, is known as a "hallucination". I noticed repetition of ideas that muddles the writing, something you get in rhyme schemes in poetry requests. Notice too, that ChatGPT cannot reference anything not in its database. Important here, is that machine learning is involved, such that it's responses may have evolved beyond hallucinations it made in the past. This would take what is called reinforced learning. The more current ChatGPT 4.0 has a much larger DB. I did not check if the response kept with the 1000-word-or-less request. Here's how it went:
My request to ChatGPT 3.5: In 2016, Frank Wilson reviewed Donald Trump's book Crippled America. The review is available at https://www.inquirer.com/philly/opinion/currents/20160306_A_closer_reading_of_Donald_Trump.html. Based on information you may gather, in up to 1000 words, what is the general consensus of Trump's book since then, especially currently?
ChatGPT's response I'm sorry for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to access external websites, including the link you provided. However, I can offer a general overview of the reception of Donald Trump's book "Crippled America" up to my last knowledge update in January 2022. Keep in mind that information may have evolved since then.
Published in 2015, "Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again" presents Donald Trump's perspectives on various issues, including immigration, trade, healthcare, and national security. The book is essentially a platform for his political ideas and policy proposals, written during his presidential campaign.
Initial reactions to the book were mixed, largely reflecting the political polarization surrounding Trump. Supporters praised the book for its straightforward language, mirroring Trump's speaking style, and appreciated its emphasis on business principles and Trump's vision for the country. Critics, on the other hand, argued that the book lacked depth and detailed policy prescriptions, dismissing it as more of a campaign tool than a comprehensive policy guide.
As Trump's presidency progressed, opinions on the book remained divided. Supporters continued to view it as a reflection of his commitment to the issues he campaigned on, while opponents criticized it for what they perceived as oversimplification of complex problems and a lack of nuance in policy discussions.
Trump's presidency, which lasted from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, saw ongoing debates over the effectiveness and implementation of his policies. This inevitably influenced perceptions of "Crippled America." Some of the key policy areas discussed in the book, such as immigration reform and trade renegotiations, became focal points of his presidency and were met with both support and opposition.
After leaving office, public opinions on Trump and his book continued to be polarized. Supporters maintained that "Crippled America" accurately reflected Trump's vision for the country, while critics argued that the book lacked the depth and detail required for effective governance.
It's important to note that assessments of Trump's book are often intertwined with broader opinions about his presidency. Those who were generally supportive of his policies tended to view the book more favorably, while those critical of his approach and decisions were more likely to be dismissive of it.
For the most current and nuanced perspectives on "Crippled America," it's recommended to check recent reviews, commentaries, and analyses from a variety of sources reflecting different political viewpoints. Keep in mind that public opinion on political figures and their works can evolve over time and may be influenced by ongoing events and developments.
In 2016, Frank Wilson reviewed Donald Trump's book Crippled America.The review is available at https://www.inquirer.com/philly/opinion/currents/20160306_A_closer_reading_of_Donald_Trump.html. Based on information you may gather, in up to 1000 words, what is the general consensus of Trump's book since then, especially currently?
ChatGPT I'm sorry for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to access external websites, including the link you provided. However, I can offer a general overview of the reception of Donald Trump's book "Crippled America" up to my last knowledge update in January 2022. Keep in mind that information may have evolved since then.
Published in 2015, "Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again" presents Donald Trump's perspectives on various issues, including immigration, trade, healthcare, and national security. The book is essentially a platform for his political ideas and policy proposals, written during his presidential campaign.
Initial reactions to the book were mixed, largely reflecting the political polarization surrounding Trump. Supporters praised the book for its straightforward language, mirroring Trump's speaking style, and appreciated its emphasis on business principles and Trump's vision for the country. Critics, on the other hand, argued that the book lacked depth and detailed policy prescriptions, dismissing it as more of a campaign tool than a comprehensive policy guide.
As Trump's presidency progressed, opinions on the book remained divided. Supporters continued to view it as a reflection of his commitment to the issues he campaigned on, while opponents criticized it for what they perceived as oversimplification of complex problems and a lack of nuance in policy discussions.
Trump's presidency, which lasted from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, saw ongoing debates over the effectiveness and implementation of his policies. This inevitably influenced perceptions of "Crippled America." Some of the key policy areas discussed in the book, such as immigration reform and trade renegotiations, became focal points of his presidency and were met with both support and opposition.
After leaving office, public opinions on Trump and his book continued to be polarized. Supporters maintained that "Crippled America" accurately reflected Trump's vision for the country, while critics argued that the book lacked the depth and detail required for effective governance.
It's important to note that assessments of Trump's book are often intertwined with broader opinions about his presidency. Those who were generally supportive of his policies tended to view the book more favorably, while those critical of his approach and decisions were more likely to be dismissive of it.
For the most current and nuanced perspectives on "Crippled America," it's recommended to check recent reviews, commentaries, and analyses from a variety of sources reflecting different political viewpoints. Keep in mind that public opinion on political figures and their works can evolve over time and may be influenced by ongoing events and developments.
Hi Frank,
ReplyDeleteThanks for this article. It's a good one that I had not read yet, as I have been delving into AI for the past few weeks, filling the hole in my brain, similar to how I filled the hole in my heart with Mary 10 years ago. Indeed, I even got an IBM credential or "badge": Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals.
The latest news on bad use of AI is the artificial Biden voice telling voters in NH not to vote. The techie who released it worked at OpenAI, and got fired for it. The problem was that the prankster had to be fired after some damage had been done. I listened to the audio and it was poorly done in both faking the voice and in being unconvincing. Yet and still, these "problems" with inaccuracy in AI are already being addressed, such that I was surprised how bad the not-so-deepfake of Biden was done. (Maybe another reason to fire the not-so-techie prankster?) These fake voices can be better charged with different emotions and such, just for the asking.
Anyway, the latest artificial I've read, is this one: The State of AI: An Urgent Need for Transparency. It's from just the first AI periodical that I have gone through this afternoon.
That hole in my brain, about AI, may be something others are sensing, a sort of falling behind. Their courses are free. Here's the link: IBM SkillsBuild. I received a badge in Mindfulness there, maybe my next will be CyberSecurity.
Hi Frank,
ReplyDeleteOn the use of LLMs or Large Language Models, I conversed with ChatGPT 3.5 (not the much advanced ChatGPT 4.0) on Trumps' book Crippled America. Anything that ChatGPT or any other LLM reports that is false, is known as a "hallucination". I noticed repetition of ideas that muddles the writing, something you get in rhyme schemes in poetry requests. Notice too, that ChatGPT cannot reference anything not in its database. Important here, is that machine learning is involved, such that it's responses may have evolved beyond hallucinations it made in the past. This would take what is called reinforced learning. The more current ChatGPT 4.0 has a much larger DB. I did not check if the response kept with the 1000-word-or-less request. Here's how it went:
My request to ChatGPT 3.5:
In 2016, Frank Wilson reviewed Donald Trump's book Crippled America. The review is available at https://www.inquirer.com/philly/opinion/currents/20160306_A_closer_reading_of_Donald_Trump.html. Based on information you may gather, in up to 1000 words, what is the general consensus of Trump's book since then, especially currently?
ChatGPT's response
I'm sorry for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to access external websites, including the link you provided. However, I can offer a general overview of the reception of Donald Trump's book "Crippled America" up to my last knowledge update in January 2022. Keep in mind that information may have evolved since then.
Published in 2015, "Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again" presents Donald Trump's perspectives on various issues, including immigration, trade, healthcare, and national security. The book is essentially a platform for his political ideas and policy proposals, written during his presidential campaign.
Initial reactions to the book were mixed, largely reflecting the political polarization surrounding Trump. Supporters praised the book for its straightforward language, mirroring Trump's speaking style, and appreciated its emphasis on business principles and Trump's vision for the country. Critics, on the other hand, argued that the book lacked depth and detailed policy prescriptions, dismissing it as more of a campaign tool than a comprehensive policy guide.
As Trump's presidency progressed, opinions on the book remained divided. Supporters continued to view it as a reflection of his commitment to the issues he campaigned on, while opponents criticized it for what they perceived as oversimplification of complex problems and a lack of nuance in policy discussions.
Trump's presidency, which lasted from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, saw ongoing debates over the effectiveness and implementation of his policies. This inevitably influenced perceptions of "Crippled America." Some of the key policy areas discussed in the book, such as immigration reform and trade renegotiations, became focal points of his presidency and were met with both support and opposition.
After leaving office, public opinions on Trump and his book continued to be polarized. Supporters maintained that "Crippled America" accurately reflected Trump's vision for the country, while critics argued that the book lacked the depth and detail required for effective governance.
It's important to note that assessments of Trump's book are often intertwined with broader opinions about his presidency. Those who were generally supportive of his policies tended to view the book more favorably, while those critical of his approach and decisions were more likely to be dismissive of it.
cont. . . .
ReplyDelete. . . . cont.
For the most current and nuanced perspectives on "Crippled America," it's recommended to check recent reviews, commentaries, and analyses from a variety of sources reflecting different political viewpoints. Keep in mind that public opinion on political figures and their works can evolve over time and may be influenced by ongoing events and developments.
In 2016, Frank Wilson reviewed Donald Trump's book Crippled America.The review is available at https://www.inquirer.com/philly/opinion/currents/20160306_A_closer_reading_of_Donald_Trump.html. Based on information you may gather, in up to 1000 words, what is the general consensus of Trump's book since then, especially currently?
ChatGPT
I'm sorry for any confusion, but I don't have the ability to access external websites, including the link you provided. However, I can offer a general overview of the reception of Donald Trump's book "Crippled America" up to my last knowledge update in January 2022. Keep in mind that information may have evolved since then.
Published in 2015, "Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again" presents Donald Trump's perspectives on various issues, including immigration, trade, healthcare, and national security. The book is essentially a platform for his political ideas and policy proposals, written during his presidential campaign.
Initial reactions to the book were mixed, largely reflecting the political polarization surrounding Trump. Supporters praised the book for its straightforward language, mirroring Trump's speaking style, and appreciated its emphasis on business principles and Trump's vision for the country. Critics, on the other hand, argued that the book lacked depth and detailed policy prescriptions, dismissing it as more of a campaign tool than a comprehensive policy guide.
As Trump's presidency progressed, opinions on the book remained divided. Supporters continued to view it as a reflection of his commitment to the issues he campaigned on, while opponents criticized it for what they perceived as oversimplification of complex problems and a lack of nuance in policy discussions.
Trump's presidency, which lasted from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, saw ongoing debates over the effectiveness and implementation of his policies. This inevitably influenced perceptions of "Crippled America." Some of the key policy areas discussed in the book, such as immigration reform and trade renegotiations, became focal points of his presidency and were met with both support and opposition.
After leaving office, public opinions on Trump and his book continued to be polarized. Supporters maintained that "Crippled America" accurately reflected Trump's vision for the country, while critics argued that the book lacked the depth and detail required for effective governance.
It's important to note that assessments of Trump's book are often intertwined with broader opinions about his presidency. Those who were generally supportive of his policies tended to view the book more favorably, while those critical of his approach and decisions were more likely to be dismissive of it.
For the most current and nuanced perspectives on "Crippled America," it's recommended to check recent reviews, commentaries, and analyses from a variety of sources reflecting different political viewpoints. Keep in mind that public opinion on political figures and their works can evolve over time and may be influenced by ongoing events and developments.
Sorry, somehow I copied it in doubly as I went back and forth among tabs. ChatGPT ended at the first paragraph of the continuation post
ReplyDelete