Sunday, August 27, 2006

Patrick Kurp has a suggestion ...

... Let's Review. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.) I suppose full disclosure is in order. Patrick reviews for The Inquirer. Like him, I am a Guy Davenport fan.

Oh, and here is Davenport's complete letter (also compliments of Dave Lull.)

3 comments:

  1. Karp makes some interesting points. I disagree completely, though, with this one:

    "I expect at least one quotation from the work at hand, if not several, accompanied by at least glancing analysis."

    I find quotations in reviews to be useless space fillers. I never include them.

    A sentence or two, or even a whole paragraph, taken out of context and slapped into the body of a review does absolutely nothing for me.

    I'd rather read the reviewer's own thoughts and analysis. If I'm going to read the book, I'll just go read the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm a hopeless quoter myself, I fear - though I have nothing against reviews that don't include any. There are some books, however - John Banville's The Sea, for instance - that are so much about style that it seems necessary quote in order to give the reader of the review a taste of what you're talking about. The real problem with quoting, I find, is that not everybody is good at picking ones that work. I have read a good number of reviews where the quotes seem to be exactly what you call them: "useless space fillers."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you may be on to something. I think I might not like them much because I'm not very good at picking them -- and they also seem not necessary for genre fiction.

    Very occasionally there might be a particular passage that resonates so strongly that it cries out to be quoted. But I'm still wary of the practice. :)

    ReplyDelete