Thought you might be interested in this (sort of) defense of Dan Brown: http://www.theawl.com/2009/09/booked-up-dan-browns-the-lost-symbol.
Dan Brown...again. Can't bear this guy's prose -- it's so damn bad -- but he is provocative. Unfortunately, because I can't bear his prose, he isn't going to get the chance to provoke me in any other way.
How come they only found two errors in The Lost Symbol? Does it mean his handling of facts is improving?