… there is one feature I notice that is generally missing in cargo cult science. … It’s a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty — a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid — not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you’ve eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked — to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The trouble with experts ...
... according to Richard Feynman: The Difference between ‘True Science’ and ‘Cargo-Cult Science’.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
True, unless your experiment is in the political field. Then such behavior will be denigrated as weak, indecisive, too intellectual, viz, Adlai Stevenson.
ReplyDeleteOnly politics, I think we all agree, is not science, and has no experts -- unless you consider winning a sign of expertise.
ReplyDeleteMaybe "politics" is one the sciences taught by Professor Quincy Wagstaff, of Huxley College.
ReplyDelete:-)
I agree that politics is not a science although a number of universities have Departments of Political Science, and students can graduate with degrees in Political Science.
ReplyDeleteStill, I believe that Feynman's call for "a kind of utter honesty - a kind of leaning over backwards" can be usefully applied to a number of important endeavors, including the political one.
Well, Lincoln, you're sure in hell right about that, though it is rare indeed.
ReplyDelete