Thursday, February 28, 2013

Back to square one …

… The Turn Against Nabokov : The New Yorker. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

In January, three men jumped the play’s twenty-four-year-old producer, Anton Suslov, giving him two black eyes and a concussion while calling him a “pedophile”; a murky video of the beating was posted online. The same libel was slashed in spray paint across the walls of the Nabokov museum in St. Petersburg and the writer’s ancestral estate in Rozhdestveno, about fifty miles from the city. Anonymous activists had petitioned to have the play banned, the museum closed, and Nabokov’s books purged from stores. The author, whose novels thrum with ironic recurrences, might have been perversely pleased with this: thirty-six years after his death and twenty-two years after the fall of the Soviet Union with all its khudsovets, Vladimir Nabokov is, once again, controversial.

These events are some of the more alarming demonstrations of Russia’s rightward tack. Ever since the wave of urban protest that hit the country in late 2011, Vladimir Putin and his United Russia Party seem to have decided to cut their losses with the country’s finicky élites and focus on demonizing them as Western agents for the benefit of a poorer, older, more rural voter base.

You would think the write would notice that the "rightward track" brings Russia back to where it was under the Soviet, who were never referred to as "rightward." Tyranny is tyranny. England may be said to have turned "rightward" under Margaret Thatcher , but nothing resembling tyranny followed. Such subtleties apparently escape The New Yorker's editors.

No comments:

Post a Comment