Wednesday, December 26, 2007
I am off today ...
... and my stepdaughter Gwen and her family are coming down from Massachusetts for a visit. Blogging will resume when I have time.
I'd be more impressed ...
... if he were planning to tour the Middle East: Dawkins to preach atheism to US.
I'm sorry. I read The God Delusion and was singularly unimpressed. I think Dawkins has evolved into a horse's ass.
I'm sorry. I read The God Delusion and was singularly unimpressed. I think Dawkins has evolved into a horse's ass.
The rest is ...
... Keeping Silence. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
"Funny how when we think of ourselves as a thing, we truly come to acquire the attributes of that thing."
"Funny how when we think of ourselves as a thing, we truly come to acquire the attributes of that thing."
Our discomfort with silence is telling. Even I, who try to spend some time every morning in silence, feel that discomfort from time to time. I was made aware of this especially when I started watching the film Into Great Silence. I have since tried to curb my tendency to multitask. I also think that if we want to get at the truth of reality, we have to start with what we most directly experience of it - ourselves. And we do not know ourselves as machines or chemical reactions or even as effects of causes. We know ourselves as persons. The fundamental thing I know about myself is that I am I. Duns Scotus was right to emphasize the mystery of individuation (what makes this particular thing what it is in particular is precisely what it does not have in common with anything else).
A look at the future ...
... to see if it works (apparently it does, and quite well): The future, ahead of schedule. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Well, I tried it with Jacques Brel, listened to him live singing "Les Bourgeois," which was followed by a Leonard Cohen song that sounded interesting. I will have to play with it some more. I listen mostly to classical music, so I guess it has less to offer me - though I'd be interested in learning how it tracks my tastes.
Well, I tried it with Jacques Brel, listened to him live singing "Les Bourgeois," which was followed by a Leonard Cohen song that sounded interesting. I will have to play with it some more. I listen mostly to classical music, so I guess it has less to offer me - though I'd be interested in learning how it tracks my tastes.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
What is and isn't ...
... Raymond Tallis on Parmenides.
I think it worth noting that around the same time as Parmenides - earlier, in fact - Heraclitus had introduced the term logos, which actually has much the same meaning as the Chinese term tao, itself introduced at around the same time by the Lao-tse. Parmenides and Heraclitus are thought of proto-philosophers, but there seem to religious implications in what they were saying.
It may be time ... to go back to the time when our cognitive godfather set us on a road to the secular understanding that has been so wonderfully elaborated over the 2,500 years since. We need to return to the Parmenidean moment to see whether, without losing all the gains that post-Parmenidean thought has brought us, there might be another cognitive journey from that which western thought has taken.
I think it worth noting that around the same time as Parmenides - earlier, in fact - Heraclitus had introduced the term logos, which actually has much the same meaning as the Chinese term tao, itself introduced at around the same time by the Lao-tse. Parmenides and Heraclitus are thought of proto-philosophers, but there seem to religious implications in what they were saying.
Monday, December 24, 2007
Philip Pullman is right ...
... about C.S. Lewis: Their Disbelief Is My Strength. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Occasionally, there have been comments posted here asserting that my evident lack of virtue (as perceived by the commenters) contradicts my professed faith. I have been meaning to point out that my profession of faith should not understood as an assertion of holiness. Quite the opposite, in fact. My profession of faith is an admission of my sinfulness. This is something many unbelievers seem to have a hard time grasping.
A timely move ...
... Call for a new awakening. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Parmenides matters not just for philosophy. One of the effects of the moribund state of intellectual enquiry that Tallis worries about is found in science. Physics is reaching an 'arrest of understanding', in say the extremes of string theory. Or in neurobiology, the study of consciousness has hit a brick wall, for all that its exponents engage in elaborate strategies of denial: we are being led towards a third-person understanding of ourselves, when we have first-person consciousness; as if we were machines not minds. That is dangerous.
Another part of Tallis' concern is that along with this scientism, though diametrically opposed to it, comes an 'oppressive supernaturalism'. You see it in the confrontation between bleak, deterministic Darwinism and fundamentalist, Christian creationism. They compete for the right to respond to our deepest human needs, to understand, forcing out the infinitely more subtle Parmenidian spirit in the process.
Miraculous art ...
... by Henry Ossawa Tanner, one of this country's best painters: The Annunciation.
Yuletide Nige ...
... Monday, December 24, 2007.
R.S. Thomas is my candidate for best British poet after Auden. (I say British because Thomas himself would have insisted he was Welsh - though he wrote in English.)
Sunday, December 23, 2007
Nige and I ...
... are kindred spirits: A Happy Clappy Squirmalong.
I had to endure one of those ghastly pop hymns this morning, something called "Gentle Woman," about Mary. And of course every Sunday my ears are assaulted by psalm settings - horribly clunky recitative and refrain jobs - written by one Owen Alstott, my candidate for the worst composer who has ever lived
You heard it here first ...
... sort of, but this is a different take, to be sure - naturally, I support it: A New Common Language for the European Union. I should think this would appeal to the clerisy. What better way to distinguish themselves from the common herd?
Virtually unreal ...
... However virtuous, virtual science is no substitute for the real thing.
Edward O. Wilson is mentioned in the article linked to above. He is interviewed in today's Sunday Times by Bryan Appleyard: We’re not as selfish as we think.
Edward O. Wilson is mentioned in the article linked to above. He is interviewed in today's Sunday Times by Bryan Appleyard: We’re not as selfish as we think.
Today's Inquirer book page ...
... featuring Picasso, Nureyev, and the Tyson-Douglas fight - and much more!
Since Maxine has brought up Christopher Fry in the comments, I thought it might be worthwhile to post a link to his obituary: Christian humanist playwright who brought a spiritual elan to the drab world of postwar theatre.
Since Maxine has brought up Christopher Fry in the comments, I thought it might be worthwhile to post a link to his obituary: Christian humanist playwright who brought a spiritual elan to the drab world of postwar theatre.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
Former PM becomes RC ...
... Tony Blair Converts to Catholicism.
Three years ago, I reviewed Philip Stephens's Tony Blair:The Making of a World Leader. Here is part of what I wrote:
Three years ago, I reviewed Philip Stephens's Tony Blair:The Making of a World Leader. Here is part of what I wrote:
Blair is openly and seriously religious. "If you want to really understand what I'm all about," Blair once told an interviewer, "you have to take a look at a guy called John Macmurray. It's all there. "
An Oxford philosopher, Macmurray (1891-1976) was a personalist, holding the view that what is real is the personal, that the characteristics of personality - consciousness, freedom, purposefulness - are also the fundamental characteristics of reality itself. For Macmurray, religion is fundamental to human life and the essence of religion involves the creation of community. This, Blair has said, makes "sense of the need to involve the individual in society without the individual being subsumed in society. "
In an essay he wrote in 1993, Blair declared that the Christian faith is about "the union between individual and community. . . . The act of Holy Communion is symbolic of this message. It acknowledges that we do not grow up in total independence, but interdependently. " Sounds almost as if Jesus is Blair's favorite political philosopher.
Aha!
... so this is what Expelled is about: Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life’s Origin. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
I now agree with Jeff McDonald's comment here, since I happen to agree that "the scientific enterprise looks to nature to answer questions about nature." In other words, science is about how nature works. Religion is about something else.
Dave Lull sent me what Ben Stein has to say about the Times piece. It's only available on subscription, but I think it only to quote a bit of it:
But then why am I in the article? I didn't schedule the interviews. No
one I interviewed ever asked me what the movie was about. So far as I
know, all of the people interviewed were paid and paid well. None of
them ever complained to me. So why am I in that article?
First, because I told the reporter that I thought Darwinism sometimes
led to racism and to the Holocaust as evil people believed they would
just help along "survival of the fittest." This, according to the
reporter, is a view commonly held by Creationists. So now I am a
Creationist, you see, a knuckle-dragging Creationist like the William
Jennings Bryan character in Inherit the Wind. ("Mr. Stein, do you now
or have you ever believed in a God of Creation?")
Second, because I denied that I ever misled anyone. So there's a photo
of me in a silly outfit with the caption, "Ben Stein denies he misled
anyone." The caption--of course-implies that I did mislead someone but
that I deny it. Now here comes the great part: NO ONE IN THE ARTICLE
ACCUSES ME OF MISLEADING HIM OR HER.
I now agree with Jeff McDonald's comment here, since I happen to agree that "the scientific enterprise looks to nature to answer questions about nature." In other words, science is about how nature works. Religion is about something else.
Dave Lull sent me what Ben Stein has to say about the Times piece. It's only available on subscription, but I think it only to quote a bit of it:
But then why am I in the article? I didn't schedule the interviews. No
one I interviewed ever asked me what the movie was about. So far as I
know, all of the people interviewed were paid and paid well. None of
them ever complained to me. So why am I in that article?
First, because I told the reporter that I thought Darwinism sometimes
led to racism and to the Holocaust as evil people believed they would
just help along "survival of the fittest." This, according to the
reporter, is a view commonly held by Creationists. So now I am a
Creationist, you see, a knuckle-dragging Creationist like the William
Jennings Bryan character in Inherit the Wind. ("Mr. Stein, do you now
or have you ever believed in a God of Creation?")
Second, because I denied that I ever misled anyone. So there's a photo
of me in a silly outfit with the caption, "Ben Stein denies he misled
anyone." The caption--of course-implies that I did mislead someone but
that I deny it. Now here comes the great part: NO ONE IN THE ARTICLE
ACCUSES ME OF MISLEADING HIM OR HER.
Friday, December 21, 2007
Thursday, December 20, 2007
The easiest thing to forget ...
... Atheism and the Avoidance of the SBO.
Well, Bryan is right on the money with this. Actually, I have had a nearly lifelong suspicion that the clue to understanding the meaning of things is right out there in the open for all of us to see, that we're in fact looking at it all the time practically, but simply don't notice it. I still haven't noticed it myself, which is why I can't tell you what it is.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Disingenuous ...
... The Vatican’s Relative Truth. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
In each case, Benedict was actually trying to make a deeper point worth hearing. In Auschwitz, his contention was that objective truth grounded in God is the only bulwark against the blind will to power; his Regensburg address was devoted to reason and faith, arguing that reason shorn of faith becomes nihilism, while faith without reason ends in fanaticism and violence; and in Brazil, he argued that since Christ embraces all humanity, he cannot be foreign to anyone’s spiritual experience.
Those ideas, however, were overshadowed by a few throwaway phrases that betray a worrying insensitivity to how unfamiliar audiences are likely to hear what he says.
But serious reading means not basing your understanding of a piece on throwaway phrases.
Let the listings begin ...
... 2007 The Best Books: Poetry.
and here is Eric Ormsby on Ted Hughes: Autobiography of a Mythic Life.
(Links courtesy of Dave Lull.)
and here is Eric Ormsby on Ted Hughes: Autobiography of a Mythic Life.
(Links courtesy of Dave Lull.)
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
End days ...
... pondering a world without reading: Twilight of the Books. (Hat tip, Rus Bowden.)
... pondering a world with readers. I like this: “an enthralling tour of the world … anticipating, often poetically, what a planet without us would be like.” Well, it wouldn't be "like" anything, since there would be no one to make the comparison. Further evidence that D.H. Lawrence may have been right and that many who warn against apocalypse deep down yearn for it.
... pondering a world with readers. I like this: “an enthralling tour of the world … anticipating, often poetically, what a planet without us would be like.” Well, it wouldn't be "like" anything, since there would be no one to make the comparison. Further evidence that D.H. Lawrence may have been right and that many who warn against apocalypse deep down yearn for it.
Monday, December 17, 2007
That's it for me ...
... until tomorrow. It's been a long day and included the funeral of a friend. Sometimes it's good to have some quiet time.
Death be not proud ...
... That Diana Letter in Full. (This gives you the opportunity to read Bryan's heartwarming account of Diana's funeral.)
Vote of approval ...
... Inquirer film critic Steven Rea on Steve Erickson's latest: Zeroville, Must Read.
Sunday, December 16, 2007
Poetry on the Net ...
... via Rus Bowden:
xmas cheer.
Blue's Reviewing the Bookstore Massacre. (Really neat.)
Carol Saba looks at Adam Zagajewski's Ordinary Life.
Some Randy Adams computer poetry: 1 blue 5 red.
And Hedgie has Some More Short Poems.
xmas cheer.
Blue's Reviewing the Bookstore Massacre. (Really neat.)
Carol Saba looks at Adam Zagajewski's Ordinary Life.
Some Randy Adams computer poetry: 1 blue 5 red.
And Hedgie has Some More Short Poems.
I'm with Glenn ...
... and Jorn: Advice to new bloggers.
The importance of linking has eluded many in the MSM who undertake to blog.
Yes this deserves a look:
The importance of linking has eluded many in the MSM who undertake to blog.
Yes this deserves a look:
Leave it to Keith Ward ...
... to turn the multiverse notion to the advantage of theism: God and the multiverse. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Intellectual abrasion ...
... a chat with Terry Eagleton: The armchair revolutionary.
This is a very good article (despite this preposterous assertion: "His early years were shaped by fundamentalist religion." I'm a year older than Eagleton and had much the same sort of education as he had. It was Catholic, not fundamentalist. And damned good, I might add.) I hardly agree with Eagleton across the board, but it is hard not to sense - and admire - how passionately engaged he is.
This is a very good article (despite this preposterous assertion: "His early years were shaped by fundamentalist religion." I'm a year older than Eagleton and had much the same sort of education as he had. It was Catholic, not fundamentalist. And damned good, I might add.) I hardly agree with Eagleton across the board, but it is hard not to sense - and admire - how passionately engaged he is.
To kill or not ...
... I have become involved in a discussion over at Bryan's blog: New Jersey's Death Penalty.
Today's Inquirer book page ...
... featuring Melville, Henry Adams and Inanimate Alice.
Also, Carlin Romano looks at Two polar, persuasive stands on reproductive genetics and offers a roundup of books Exquisitely brewed for the coffee table.
Also, Carlin Romano looks at Two polar, persuasive stands on reproductive genetics and offers a roundup of books Exquisitely brewed for the coffee table.
Saturday, December 15, 2007
In memoriam ...
... Laura Huxley has died: Widow of Aldous Huxley preserved his legacy. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Franklin the blogger ...
... What If Ben Were One of Us? (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
I suspect he would be. Though I must confess that regarding Ben, I am of one mind with D.H. Lawrence: "I admire him. I do not like him."
I suspect he would be. Though I must confess that regarding Ben, I am of one mind with D.H. Lawrence: "I admire him. I do not like him."
Lessing's lamentation ...
... in her Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Doris Lessing deplored what she called the inanities of the Internet: A hunger for books.
Chris Berg begs to differ: Bookish pessimists are elitist and wrong: the internet is good for you. (Hat tip, Rus Bowden.)
Good point: "Doris Lessing and Andrew Keen compare the best of the past with the average of the present. With a formula like that, it's no wonder today always loses."
Chris Berg begs to differ: Bookish pessimists are elitist and wrong: the internet is good for you. (Hat tip, Rus Bowden.)
Good point: "Doris Lessing and Andrew Keen compare the best of the past with the average of the present. With a formula like that, it's no wonder today always loses."
Friday, December 14, 2007
And another ...
... discovery, that is: Errol Morris Creates a New Literary Form. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
I have to say that what I found especially interesting is that Ron Rosenbaum and I share a fondness for Pale Fire, The Anatomy of Melncholy, and Urne-Buriall (how resist "and Charles V will never live within two Methuselahs of Hector"?).
Open-ended creativity ...
... otherwise known as being: God debates.
I like this from John Polkinghorne: ". . . the order and disorder which intertwine in the process of the world show that the universe upheld by the divine Word is not a clear cold cosmos whose history is the inevitable unfolding of an invulnerable plan. It is a world kept in being by the divine Juggler rather than by the divine Structural Engineer ..." And having had the privilege of meeting and interviewing John Polkinghorne, I can attest to what Archbishop Hapgood says of him. A wonderful man.
I like this from John Polkinghorne: ". . . the order and disorder which intertwine in the process of the world show that the universe upheld by the divine Word is not a clear cold cosmos whose history is the inevitable unfolding of an invulnerable plan. It is a world kept in being by the divine Juggler rather than by the divine Structural Engineer ..." And having had the privilege of meeting and interviewing John Polkinghorne, I can attest to what Archbishop Hapgood says of him. A wonderful man.
Forget Dickens
What's so good about these indigestible birds? My goose was cooked — and it wasn’t very good. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
The principal problem I have with goose - and I've cooked a good number - is that, when all is said and, there isn't a lot of meat to be had from one. So it takes a good deal of effort to make a meal for a relatively small dinner party.
The principal problem I have with goose - and I've cooked a good number - is that, when all is said and, there isn't a lot of meat to be had from one. So it takes a good deal of effort to make a meal for a relatively small dinner party.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Thank God ...
... or whoever you want, but I'm glad somebody said it: On a stairway to Hell.
It must say something about how tame youth music has become that the year's most talked-about gigs star a “girdle power” group and boring even-older farts who had a nice cup of tea afterwards.
Real vs. ideal ...
... The Back Page: Fighting the Good Fight. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Apparently, I have been a subscriber to the Panzaic theory without knowing it. This afternoon, Debbie and I went to the art museum (as we Philadelphians refer to the Philadelphia Museum of Art) to see the exhibition of Renoir landscapes. I have never been much of a Renoir fan and this exhibition didn't do anything to change that. There is one great painting - The Promenade. It has drama and psychological depth. And there were a few very good ones - Village Street, a snapshot in oil of Louveciennes, was one. But for the most part, Renoir seems to have had only a professional interest in landscape. The landscape is merely a pretext for a painting. He does not otherwise engage the landscape, and so does not draw the viewer into it. Sisley's Snow at Louveciennes, on the other hand, seems to me to have captured a specific time and place and its weather and mood for ever. One does not merely look at it, one feels it and lives it.
I'm off today ...
... and tomorrow. So blogging will be light - because there are other things I have to do.
Richard Rodriguez ...
... Race Poll Sign of Hope and Despair. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
Why post this on a book blog? Because it has to do with humanity and that is what literature is all about. And also because Richard Rodriguez's is one of the most civilized voices in America.
Why post this on a book blog? Because it has to do with humanity and that is what literature is all about. And also because Richard Rodriguez's is one of the most civilized voices in America.
Trio
... first, here is Terry Teachout's Sursum corda, in which reference is made to Conon McPherson's play, The Seafarer, which Terry reviews in Broadway's Back -- and Booming. And here is an interview with playwright McPherson: Conor McPherson Lifts the Veil.
(All three links come courtesy of the intrepid Dave Lull.)
(All three links come courtesy of the intrepid Dave Lull.)
Appalling ...
... I refer to a number of the comments appended to this post of Nige's: Pratchett's Embuggerance.
I haven't read Pratchett and it hardly matters in connection with the terrible news of his illness. Like Nige, I find the manner of Pratchett's announcement wholly admirable. He deserves prayers, not gibes.
Oh, really
The Battle of the Book.
I am actually old enough to remember when the same sort of crap was said about ... paperbacks!
I am actually old enough to remember when the same sort of crap was said about ... paperbacks!
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Latin lovers
When Virginia's all-star team of young scholars competes in a national quiz bowl, a dead language is very much alive.
I don't think there was much impact around here when, a few weeks ago, John Timpane and I weighed in on Latin (Seize the Latin, or fun with a dead language and The epic, and relevant, story of the Latin language), but maybe now that the Washington Post has noticed something similar to what I mentioned, that " 'there's a bit of a revival going on.' In 1977, only 6,000 students took the National Latin Exam. By 2005 that number had soared to 134,873" - well, who knows?
I don't think there was much impact around here when, a few weeks ago, John Timpane and I weighed in on Latin (Seize the Latin, or fun with a dead language and The epic, and relevant, story of the Latin language), but maybe now that the Washington Post has noticed something similar to what I mentioned, that " 'there's a bit of a revival going on.' In 1977, only 6,000 students took the National Latin Exam. By 2005 that number had soared to 134,873" - well, who knows?
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Blogger reviews
From A Book A Week: The Collection by Gioia Deliberto.
From BooksForKids: Spoofing Santa: A Cajun Night Before Christmas and Other Downhome Sendups.
From Debra Hamel: Somoza, José Carlos: Zig Zag.
From the Emerging Writers Network: Book Review: 2007-015 The Farther Shore by Matthew Eck.
From BooksForKids: Spoofing Santa: A Cajun Night Before Christmas and Other Downhome Sendups.
From Debra Hamel: Somoza, José Carlos: Zig Zag.
From the Emerging Writers Network: Book Review: 2007-015 The Farther Shore by Matthew Eck.
Monday, December 10, 2007
SciFi rumbles
Scalzi, Heinlein and more.
As Scalzi says:
As Scalzi says:
Science fiction is and always has been a consumer genre; its roots are in engineering and pulp magazines, not in academia. This is why sales matter in science fiction; more directly than nearly any other genre, the people who eventually write science fiction are the people who grow up reading science fiction. People start writing literary fiction as they tumble through writing programs at Sarah Lawrence or Bennington or Iowa because that’s what they’re expected to write and they want to impress their professors and fellow students; people start writing science fiction, on the other hand, roughly ten seconds after they set down The Star Beast or Ender’s Game or Snow Crash because they get done with the book and think, holy crap, I want to do that. Academia generally wants you to show you can write; science fiction generally wants you to tell a story. It’s the storytellers who get picked up by the next generation of science fiction writers, and whose work is used as the blueprint for their own works.
The ethics of book reviewing
For all interested parties: The NBCC's 2007 survey results.
Feel free to weigh in.
More here: Ethics in Book Reviewing Survey: The Results.
Feel free to weigh in.
More here: Ethics in Book Reviewing Survey: The Results.
Sunday, December 09, 2007
A different take ...
... on evolution: Teilhard de Chardin and the Noosphere.
Teilhard was also convinced that a further and even more profound change had taken place. On the one hand we could see humanity simply swept along in a evolutionary stream into the future over which he had no control. Or, we could see that an evolution conscious of itself could also direct itself. "Not only do we read in our slightest acts the secrets of [evolutions] proceedings; but for an elementary part we hold it in our hands, responsible for its past to its future." (p. 226) Noogenesis moves ever more clearly toward self-direction; it is now something we determine.
Teilhard was a major influence on me when I was in college. I believe in evolution, but I think it is purposeful.
Teilhard was also convinced that a further and even more profound change had taken place. On the one hand we could see humanity simply swept along in a evolutionary stream into the future over which he had no control. Or, we could see that an evolution conscious of itself could also direct itself. "Not only do we read in our slightest acts the secrets of [evolutions] proceedings; but for an elementary part we hold it in our hands, responsible for its past to its future." (p. 226) Noogenesis moves ever more clearly toward self-direction; it is now something we determine.
Teilhard was a major influence on me when I was in college. I believe in evolution, but I think it is purposeful.
Getting to know ...
... our fellow bloggers: The Carlisle HappenStance Poetry Party (I refer to the photo).
When classicists go bad ...
... Name and shame for bad classicists.
I'm just now getting down to reading Mary's new book, The Roman Triumph. It's quite fascinating.
I'm just now getting down to reading Mary's new book, The Roman Triumph. It's quite fascinating.
Language problem ...
... Climate Conflicts. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
"It took years for a consensus on the existence and causes of climate change to emerge."
"It took years for a consensus on the existence and causes of climate change to emerge."
I submit that this is a largely meaningless sentence. Climate, by definition, is a process. Like the ocean, it is never at rest, but continuously changing. So if you acknowledge the existence of climate,which it is hard not to do, you must necessarily acknowledge the existence climate change, since climate means the ongoing change in meteorological conditions. Note, though, that the link takes us to something about "global warming." So we do not mean "climate change" at all, but are referring instead to predictions regarding the direction such change may be taking. Regarding which, read this abstract of an article in the International Journal of Climatology. A 100 to 300 percent difference is not slight. Please note that what I am most interested in here is the weaselly mode of discourse.
Books and films ...
... or, Books, films, chalk and cheese.
I think that short stories make better movies than novels. Case in point: John Huston's The Man Who Would Be King, which I think is well-nigh perfect. Novellas do well also. The longer the work, the more the film becomes a Cliffs Notes version of the original. If filmmakers would realize this, they could help spur interest in shorter fiction, which is often better fiction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)