Sunday, July 22, 2007

How science works ...

... and how not: Angier's The Canon and New Atheism at Prosthesis. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

In this connection, this is very much worth looking at, since, I gather, it is up for peer review, and it's about soundness of methodology: Global Warming: Forecasts by Scientists versus Scientific Forecasts*.

"We have been unable to identify any scientific forecasts to support global
warming. Claims that the Earth will get warmer have no more credence than saying that it will get

No comments:

Post a Comment