Sunday, September 24, 2017

In case you wondered …

… What Should Have Happened In Hillary Clinton's Useless Book | HuffPost. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)

… as her die-hard defenders proclaimed, Clinton can write a book if she wants, and nobody gets to stop her. They’re not wrong. She has every right to write a book about the election. But not this book. Nobody should ever be allowed to write a book like this.

6 comments:

  1. And in case someone actually wonders, rather than swimming round in their fishtank:

    And in case someone actually wonders, rather than swimming round in their fish tank:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/its-worth-reading-hillary-clintons-book/539973/

    ReplyDelete
  2. That would seem to be the minority report. The Huffington Post is hardly right-wing, and the Atlantic isn't exactly impartial these days. I have no idea why anyone would waste time reading some pol's election post mortem.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I doubt that I'll read it either. But I thought you were a contrarian, or at least someone who doesn't automatically accept the majority view.

    There is no such beast as an impartial review (or much else, for that matter) -- which is precisely why we need minority reports.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It might be that a review that pans this book is among the “minority reports”:

    http://lithub.com/bookmarks/reviews/what-happened/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Dave. Librarians ought to be knighted.

      Delete
  5. Well, all the usual suspects agree, which why the Huffington post review is interesting. And since it turns out to be the minority report, I guess I remain on track as a contrarian. As far as I’m concerned “what happened” is that a lousy candidate ran a lousy campaign and underestimated her opponent while overestimating herself. But of course this is also further proof as to why I should never post anything bearing on politics. I will try to be more careful.

    ReplyDelete