It is useless to contend with the irresistible power of Time, which goes on continually creating by a process of constant destruction.
— E. T. A. Hoffman, born on this date in 1776
It is useless to contend with the irresistible power of Time, which goes on continually creating by a process of constant destruction.
For all his human frailties, we do not think of Franklin as a man with enemies, as a man who was deeply hated and capable of deep hatreds of his own. But Robert Middlekauff's short, well-written study changes that.
The moth locked up all
winter in the strongbox.
Laura Kasischke about the beginning lines of her poem ‘The first resurrection’. From Granta
Writers love maps: collecting them, creating them, and describing them. Literary cartography includes not only the literal maps that authors commission or make themselves but also the geographies they describe. The visual display of quantitative information in the digital age has made charts and maps more popular than ever, though every graphic, like every story, has a point of view.
… behold, on this selfsame platform, T. S. Eliot—a sacerdotal figure, the era’s reigning literary pope, fake-Brit sonorities reverberating like a cathedral organ, grim and tragic, and as funereal as a marble tomb. And then W. H. Auden, capaciously contrapuntal, though they lived in consonance, Eliot born in 1888, Auden in 1907, Eliot an American who chose England, Auden an Englishman turned American. They died eight years apart and knew the same world, the same political dooms, and the same return to the metaphysics of Christianity. On that broad stage, Auden seemed at the time a lesser god: only Eliot could fill, as he once did, a football stadium. The public Eliot was a venerated monument that loomed unforgivingly, while Auden, even in public, had an air of plainness. Auden’s reading was spoken; it had almost a kind of casualness, a flatness, a matter-of-factness. He read poetry as if he were reading prose.Ozick offers the commonplace disparagement of the '50s. But she is 13 years older than I. Guess it would have looked different if she had been a teenager.
John Updike said that an author’s successful late works are often characterized by a “translucent thinness.” Relatively speaking, Ravelstein would be a decent example of that thesis. In it, we’re no longer dished up the thick, rich liver pâté of Bellow’s heartiest writing, but rather something smoother, a little less heart-clogging.
… the history of literature is “littered” with vanished journals along the lines of Image, which publish work for a time, often framed in terms of ideals and agendas, and then fold or disappear, only to be remembered, if at all, for a work or two or three published there.
As is typical of the New Atheist genre, we are confronted with a blizzard of sweeping and tendentious assertions, straw men, begged questions, missed points, well-poisoning, and other evidence that the writer has read a book about logical fallacies and mistaken it for a “How-To” guide.… The envelope, please — Based on a True Story: The Fiction-Free Finalists for the Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar.
Following much negotiation, Brown, Sokal and Friedman had their paper accepted by American Psychologist and it was published online last July under the only slightly less provocative title of The Complex Dynamics of Wishful Thinking. Referring to the bizarrely precise tipping point ratio of 2.9013 that Fredrickson and Losada trumpeted applied to all humans regardless of age, gender, race or culture, the authors – in fact Brown, in this sentence – wrote: "The idea that any aspect of human behaviour or experience should be universally and reproducibly constant to five significant digits would, if proven, constitute a unique moment in the history of the social sciences."
'Soon the sun will set' — is that prophecy? No, it's merely an assertion of faith in the consistency of events.
In 1974, clinical psychologist Dennis Upper found himself stricken with writer's block. Though pen was to paper, no words would flow. He decided to solve his problem with a scientific experiment. Yet, as is frequently the case in science, his experiment didn't work as intended, and that's putting it euphemistically. Despite the failure, his work, "The unsuccessful self-treatment of a case of “writer's block,” was published in the prestigious Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis. It is reproduced in its entirety below:From RealClearScience
Earlier this month, Buzzfeed published a piece called "Why I Bought a House in Detroit for $500." The story ended up getting more than a million pageviews, which is notable because it is also more than 6,000 words long. The other notable thing: 47 percent of those views came from people accessing the story on mobile devices. And while people who read the piece on tablets spent an average of more than 12 minutes with the story, those doing so on phones spent more than 25 minutes—a small eternity, in Internet time.I can barely see my phone, much less read 6,000 word articles.
"Most authors write because they want to share something with the world or gain recognition of some sort," Greenfield said. "There are, of course, outliers. The top 2% or so of authors make a good living and the most successful authors – including self-published authors – make a tremendous amount of money."
Even with her feet on the ground, she seemed to have her heart in the clouds. She saw her life as a spiritual quest and cast herself as a pilgrim, not a visionary—as someone who sees for herself and not for others. This faithfulness to herself can seem like self-absorption, but in reading her voluminous and deeply uneven Collected Poems, one can trace the integrity in the life of her work. It is major work played in a minor key, with her quest sometimes going astray in the maze of her wanderings.I'll take her work over a good many others' any day.
In general I envy anyone who has been through a school of thought, no matter which; whether as a Jesuit or a Protestant or a Marxist or a Cabbalist; even if such a person later changes their position, they remain within a system of coordinates.
Most of the blunders recounted by Menaker aren’t too dire, but he remains haunted by the inadvertent role he played in his only sibling’s untimely death. During a game of touch football in 1967, he challenged his older brother, Mike, to play backfield despite Mike’s bad knees, and from there everything went horribly amiss: Mike, then twenty-nine, sustained an injury that led to knee surgery, and this surgery led to a fatal blood infection called septicemia.… Local, local, local: The Dictionary of American Regional English: Recent Developments.
The "world is the transcendental creation of language. . . . composed of entities which are in some sense meanings."This must in some way hold true for anyone who assents to the proposition that a Creator is speaking the world into being, by means of a single Word that took on flesh in order to effect a fundamental adjustment in the nature of reality.
Huxley and Orwell do not say gloomily, like Wells and Koestler and Shaw, “Humanity is done for, unless a miracle lifts it towards the heavens.” Rather they suggest that, if certain tendencies towards regimentation which have appeared throughout the world are allowed to develop without hindrance, then we may within a foreseeable future find ourselves trapped in a world where freedom, and all the values that go with it, have withered and been forgotten. Huxley puts the argument well when he says:Unless we choose to decentralize and to use applied science, not as the end to which human beings are to be made the means, but as the means to producing free individuals, we have only two alternatives to choose from: either a number of national, militarized totalitarianisms…or else one supranational totalitarianism … developing, under the need for efficiency and stability, into the welfare tyranny of Utopia.
What do editors really want? Why are they putting one thing in the rejection pile and preparing for an auction for another? The difficulty in answering these questions is that every editor opens every proposal the same way you open presents from relatives: with hope but trepidation. They never know when it’s going to be great, but great is exactly what they’re looking for.
Whenever I come back from a lunch with a book editor, my agency colleagues always ask, “What are they looking for over there these days?
Rachel Hadas, author of Strange Relation: A Memoir of Marriage, Dementia and Poetry(Paul Dry Books), lost her husband to early onset dementia. We talk about how poetry — hers and others’ — gave her solace during this years-long process. We also talk about poetry is a way for the poet to both release and identify emotions, why it was easier to publish collections of poetry in the 1980s and 1990s, the benefits of poetry memorization, and why the Furies looked the other way when Agamemnon sacrificed his daughter Iphigenia.
To perpetuate a traditional practice enriches the storehouse of being while also stitching together the eternal society of the dead, living, and those still unborn in such a way that past, present, and future remain habitable places, where human voice can still hear and answer human voice. It keeps words, habits, and techniques in common, it cultivates, tempers, and preserves a climate of opinion, whatever the other storms of history.
The new season reunites Holmes with his primal fan: that love addict Dr. John Watson, played by Martin Freeman. Watson has been grieving Sherlock’s suicide for two years, but he’s now dating a nurse, Mary (played by Freeman’s partner, Amanda Abbington, for added intertextuality), and he’s bought an engagement ring. When Sherlock shows up, the men’s intimacy reignites, and the game is on.… The talented Ms. Oates: Joyce Carol Oates interview: portrait of a literary powerhouse.
Her parents were “very nice people, lovely people” but “they didn’t have any great ambition for me”. She believes this lack of parental pressure was liberating. She sees the children of Princeton academics wilting under their parents’ expectations. “The children of professors feel, I think, in most cases that they have to emulate [their parents]. You can’t go work on a farm or whatever. Whereas I come from a different era, a different world, where no one expected anybody even to get a high-school diploma.”… Master of harmonics: His Blues to Be Somebody: Charlie Parker’s Early Years.
… Literary nationalism and part-time love fest: Writers attack 'overrated' Anglo-American literature at Jaipur festival.… Giddins and Scott DeVeaux write that, in his intensive study, Parker discovered that “any note, no matter how dissonant, could be made to resolve in a chord.” This realization opened unexplored avenues for soloists and led to a new, higher degree of complexity in the art form. While many older musicians rebelled against Parker’s use of dissonant harmonies and complex chromatics, those who did embrace it, and him, discovered that, in DeVeaux’s words, Parker “had the knack of making the most radical innovations seem instantly understandable, masking both the bristling complexity of the musical language and the disciplined intellect behind it.”
"I love your work, Jonathan," [award-winning author and film-maker Xiaolu Guo] told [Jonathan] Franzen, "but in a way you are smeared by English American literature … I think certain American literature is overrated, massively overrated, and I really hate to read them," she said.
I do not know whether there is Truth or Not. But I instinctively feel that I cannot be without It. And I know that if It is, then It is everything for me: reason, and good, and strength, and life, and happiness. Perhaps It is not; but I love It – Love is more than everything that exists. I already count It as existing, and I love It - though perhaps non-existent – with all my soul and all my thinking and dreaming. I renounce everything for it -Even my questions and my doubts.
What began as a story about a brilliant woman with a new invention had turned into the tale of a troubled man who had invented a new life for himself. Yet the biggest question remained unanswered: Had Dr. V created a great golf club or merely a great story?
As much as we try to understand other people’s emotions, this is what empathy looks like in real life: It’s easier to relate to people who are just like us.As a patent lawyer for 26 years, all too familiar with inventors, I am not surprised by Dr. V's inventions -- the putter or her life. As a trans person active in the community, all too familiar with trans people, I am not surprised by Dr. V's history and actions. What I don't know, and no one can say, is if there is any need for empathy. Trans people's lives suck, most of them. Does that give any of us the right to demand we be treated with kid gloves? That is, we have little protection against trans prejudice, the disgust of others, losing our family, our job, our friends and our lives if we transition and become known as trans...should we have the right to demand even greater protection against being "outed"? Even if we solicited the situation that might lead to outing in the first place?
That’s not how journalism is supposed to work, though. Yes, every reporter strives to uncover the truth. But we’re also supposed to call on our reserves of emotional intelligence to comprehend the people we’re writing about. When someone like the New York Times’ David Carr, who is very much attuned to questions of journalistic ethics, tweets out Hannan’s story approvingly with no hint about the moral dilemmas it raises, it’s clear there’s a cavernous empathy gap between mainstream writers and trans people. Hannan’s story, and the writer’s defenders, show the dangers of privileging fact-finding and the quest for a great story over compassion and humanity.
THE HEAVENS—Calling into question centuries of religious dogma and commonly held beliefs, the Lord Our God, Creator and Supreme Ruler of the Universe, admitted Tuesday that in actuality it is “extremely rare” for Him to ever forgive an individual.Darn. I was really counting on forgiveness...
Almost 45 years after his death, O'Hara has a loyal, but small, following, which includes the journalist Gay Talese and essayist Fran Leibowitz. His influence is detected as early as Irwin Shaw's '"Girls in their Summer Dresses," a 1930s short tale of smoldering marital strife; mid-century with Talese's "Frank Sinatra Has a Cold," a legendary Esquire profile, and in the 1990s with Philip Roth's numbing "American Pastoral." And yet O'Hara remains untaught in most English departments. He never received the posthumous idolatry of Hemingway or Fitzgerald. O'Hara's notoriously thin skin spoiled his legacy, but the editor William Maxwell said it best: "Good writers deserve to be remembered."
It was in Tangier that Burroughs discovered his talent for transforming into el hombre invisible. This was a projection of anonymity so total it bordered on pseudocide. Miles speculates that invisibility was Burroughs's way to negotiate his "fear of exposure and his horror of being the object of contempt and ridicule" due to his homosexuality. This is a bold claim to make on behalf of one of America's most unapologetically gay writers, but sexuality was never a prerogative for Burroughs—it was, in his opinion, a control agent to which he was preconditioned.… THE PRISONER OF STRESS.
… anxiety of the kind [Scott Stossel] is afflicted with is not a riddle. It’s an illness. There is therefore nothing, except in the medical sense, to solve. That’s not what Stossel wants to believe, though. He has an idea that more is at stake. He thinks that there is a metaphysics of anxiety. “To grapple with and understand anxiety,” he says, “is, in some sense, to grapple with and understand the human condition.”
Let every dawn be to you as the beginning of life, and every setting sun be to you as its close.
One would think, given its title, that Chwe’s book offers an in-depth game-theoretical analysis of the ways that Austen’s characters (specifically, her heroines and heroes) work through their choices (specifically, the ones they make in relation to one another)—why Elizabeth Bennet, to take the most obvious example, rejects Mr. Darcy the first time he proposes but accepts him on the next go-round.… Rude new world: The new intolerance: will we regret pushing Christians out of public life?
No such luck. What we really get, once we fight through Chwe’s meandering, ponderous, frequently self-contradictory argument, is only the claim that Austenwants her characters to think in game-theoretic ways: to reflect upon the likely consequences of their choices, to plan out how to reach their goals, to try to intuit what the people around them are thinking and how they in turn are likely to act.
… not only Christians, but also Muslims and Jews, increasingly feel they are no longer free to express any belief, no matter how deeply felt, that runs counter to the prevailing fashions for superficial “tolerance” and “equality” (terms which no longer bear their dictionary meaning but are part of a political jargon in which only certain views, and certain groups, count as legitimate).I think these "liberals" will find that trying to suppress religion is not as easy as they may think. Religion has been around a lot longer than this "liberalism".
Chatwin is less widely read a quarter-century after his passing but for no good reason. He was a superb storyteller, even if storytelling meant departing from the literal truth—a standard to which we do not hold many other literary travelers, it should be said, from Herodotus to Mark Twain. And, that said, most of his books, which were too few to begin with, remain in print.… And the winners are : The 5 Best Punctuation Marks in Literature.
The point he is in the process of making is that there is one big difference between cinema and theatre: the close-up. The cinematic close-up brings something new into the world, an intense intimacy. Istvan Szabo explained this to him when he was directing Fiennes in Sunshine (1999). “For me,” says Fiennes, lapsing into a Hungarian accent, “cinema iz about ze cloze-up — to zee thoughtz and emotionz born in the faze for the firzt time
When you read a great book, you don't escape from life, you plunge deeper into it.
The simplistic dichotomy between direct and representative democracy that Etzioni presents discounts other meaningful forms of political participation and undervalues the role that intermediary institutions and interest-group pluralism play in making transparency work. The United States is not just a representative democracy; it is a society marked by interest-group participation, with a robust ecosystem of advocacy organizations, trade associations, and other groups representing an extremely diverse set of interests.
Alan Jacobs calls The Book of Common Prayer “an instrument of social and political control”, but underplays its political dimensions in favour of an elaborate account of its reception as a religious text. Evangelical contemporaries objected to Cranmer countenancing kneeling at Communion. For John Knox this was tantamount to idolatry. Cranmer’s own equating of transubstantiation with idolatry was one of the “doctrinal errors” for which he was executed.
[Peterson] is a poet of necessary disequilibrium. With stubborn persistence, each poem struggles for balance, usually resulting in a draw between the limitations of personal comprehension and a vast naturalness of automatic being in the surround, often depicted in minutiae. A yearning for expansion of spirit ends up (almost) settling for the yearning itself. Remarkably, her poem-endings often echo this compromise yet strike the reader as quite various in what they notice or their manner of insistence.… From Muse to amusement: Absinthe: How the Green Fairy became literature’s drink.
… the general point is credible: that big companies have tamed the market anarchy of the internet. When we think of the web now, we don’t think of a bustling marketplace of small traders; we think of Google, Amazon, Apple and Facebook. The gold rush has turned into the same old land-grab.… Q&A: A Strange Composition: Classical Music Meets Bioterror In 'Orfeo'.
[Richard] Powers says he identifies with composers who are struggling to make complex, compelling works. "This balancing act between wanting to make it new and wanting to make it loved and beautiful is familiar to me," he tells NPR's Audie Cornish. "It's something that I've been wrestling with over the course of 11 novels and close to 30 years now. You write the kind of book that you wish you could find on the shelf somewhere, and you wait for someone who has the time and the focus and the desire to go deeper and to read a new story."
No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power.
Anyone who claims that regular monotheists view God like Karen Armstrong’s Apophatic Entity or Tillich’s Ground of Being simply hasn’t gotten out enough.A good many people who are not scientists assent to the truth of Darwin's take on evolution. Does Coyne think their understanding of it is as sophisticated as scientists'?
Further, it’s obvious that the bulk of harm committed in the name of religion is done by those not who see god as a Ground of Being, but rather as an anthropomorphic entity who has a personal relationship with his minions and supplies them with a moral system.
Given that arguments in the first two categories are now untenable, people like Hart have proposed conceptions of God that are so nebulous that we can’t figure out what they mean.Has Coyne read up on any quantum physics lately?
Block after block text can be off-putting. When I first received the volume from the publisher, I skimmed it and put it to the side. I was wrong to do so.Kindertotenwald is a pleasure. The poems themselves are some of Wright's most varied in terms of subject matter. We have folk tales, vignettes of Nietzsche, Verlaine, Basho, Saint Teresa, Kierkegaard, and other unidentified voices.… And the winner is: The German non-word of the year: Sozialtourismus.
Wise sayings often fall on barren ground, but a kind word is never thrown away.
If you're older than 25, you may not have heard of Whisper. But the app — already popular among high-school and college students across the country — is quickly becoming the most interesting social network around. It allows people to post anonymous Whispers (photos with a line or two of text overlaid on them, in the style of a Reddit image macro) which can then be "hearted" or replied to by other users. Users can view popular Whispers, Whispers with a common keyword, or Whispers posted from a nearby location.… ON TRANSLATING KAFKA’S “THE METAMORPHOSIS”.
… Gregor has only himself to blame for the wretchedness of his situation, since he has willingly accepted wretchedness as it was thrust upon him. Like other of Kafka’s doomed protagonists, he errs by failing to act, instead allowing himself to be acted upon. Gregor Samsa, giant bug, is a cartoon of the subaltern, a human being turned inside out. He has traded in his spine for an exoskeleton, but even this armorlike shell (“carapace” and “armor” are the same word in German, Panzer) is no defense once his suddenly powerful father starts pelting him with apples—an ironically biblical choice of weapon.
Clio, the demi-goddess in charge of history, is traditionally depicted with a scroll or a book. But as portrayed by [Peter Charles] Hoffer -- a professor of history at the University of Georgia – she is in regular communication with her peers in philosophy, law, the social sciences, and policy studies. I picture her juggling tablet, laptop and cellphone, in the contemporary manner.… Rowles on Tatum.
… I’ve come to realize when I read mysteries there is something of the spiritual running right through it, whether or not there is an explicit religious theme or figure.
If you find something to tell, tell it to your truest, though that make little to tell; the truer you speak, the more you will know to tell.
In light of the comments to my essay yesterday, I’d go one step farther now. The canon is the name by which calls for the restoration of order and coherence to literary study are misunderstood in advance and rejected out of hand without additional examination.
… even if all, or most, of Dickinson’s manuscripts end up online, would we be any closer to the real thing? In a material sense, undoubtedly so: with the tools we already use to zoom in on maps (to find the location of a new restaurant) or shopping websites (to see the detail on a jacket), we can get as close as we want to examine how Dickinson formed her c’s or how little paper she required to write a quatrain in her own hand.… Tyranny alert: New Year's Resolution: China Blocks the Guardian Newspaper's Website.
… Thomas's reputation has not always been as solid in Wales as in other parts of the world. One theory is that as a non-native speaker he was considered not Welsh enough in Wales – but was regarded as too Welsh by the English. Towns also believes that his reputation as a womaniser and drinker upset the puritanical element in Wales.… Poetry Pairing: 'Ode'.
That so few of the contemporary American novels with a religious dimension deal with the stuff right at the center of religion, and the cultural conversation about religion – matters of assent or dissent, of truth and falsehood, of calls heard and lives saved or lost – seems to me striking; and it seems to me awfully narrow, not worthy of the long tradition we share, for Greg or anybody else to suggest that our postmodern time is different from the past and that in our time only the “still, small voice” can register authentically.If you practice your faith, your faith will inform your work, and find its own voice.
Geach’s interest in the thought of both Wittgenstein and Aquinas made him an honorary founder of the philosophical school that called itself “analytical Thomism”. But while Geach was a philosopher and Catholic, his philosophy went wherever the force of logic demanded, rather than being tailored to a religious conclusion. “To me it appears blasphemous to say God is 'above’ logic,” he wrote. “Logic is not partisan, and knows nothing but to strike straight; but the sword is invincible, bearing the Maker’s name.”… Conor McPherson: 'TV is where the creative work happens now'.
Harold Bloom … was right to note the weirdness of this part of Eliot’s project—or rather, the weirdness of it working. She was, he wrote, the only “major novelist, before or since, whose overt moralizings constitute an aesthetic virtue rather than a disaster.” Which raises a question: How does she get away with it? And, beyond the basic exhortation to be good, what exactly is it that she wants us to do?… And the winner is: John Poch wins 2014 New Criterion Poetry Prize.
In Orfeo, the specter of the music is different. “God,” Els says, nonplussed, to the feds. “You think I nerve-gassed my dog.” Sensing this, his mind trains on threats of the security state: electronic surveillance, Patriot Act provisions such as “hold until cleared” like endless fermatas, a vivid memory of the Waco siege with “Innocent children … burnt to death by American law enforcement agents.” All of this, and a whole life in music, come to the surface while he runs.… The Last Word Goes to Scribblers in the Margins.
Flyleaf and title-page signatures are comforting but they don't compare with the battles for and in the margins: "Pure b.s. if you think abt it," for instance, likely from a student unimpressed by a Pulitzer winner's (truly dull, in fact) poetry. Or "Does anybody actually know wtf this means?" (written beside the words "objective correlative").… An Appreciation of Ian G. Barbour (1923-2013).
Ian was instrumental in taking questions from the long-standing relationship between science and religion -- questions about the origin and future of the universe, the age of the Earth, the unfolding of life, or the nature of science -- and reframing these in the language of modern science and in the idiom of contemporary theology.… A Conversation with Verlyn Klinkenborg on the Craft of Academic Writing.
Somewhere in the world there is an epigram for every dilemma.
This year’s [MLA] conference theme is “Vulnerable Times.” MLA president Marianne Hirsch explained the concept a few months ago: “The Presidential Forum [one among many panels on the topic] will theorize vulnerability’s complex temporalities. Discussing embodiment, poverty, climate, activism, reparation, and the condition of being unequally governed, forum participants will expose key sites of vulnerability and assess possibilities for change.”How can anyone take someone who writes this sort of drivel seriously? And why would anyone think that persons trafficking in this sort of pseudo- discourse could even address let alone solve any of the world's problems?