... He Who Must Not Be Named: A Bagatelle of Frivological Triviality. (Hat tip, Dave Lull.)
My only quibble here is that, insofar as I could grasp Stuart Kauffman's argument, I felt that he had the same problem as HWMNBN, that God is not necessary only in the sense in which Kauffman understands God. But I don't think Kauffman's own concept of a creator deity is sound. In other words, God is a creator, but not in the sense in which Kauffman (or creationists, for that matter) think.
No comments:
Post a Comment