Michael Baigent said: "Whether our hypothesis is right or wrong is irrelevant. The fact is that this is work that we put together and spent years and years building up. . . . We are being lumped in with Dan Brown's work of fiction and that degrades the historical implication of our material. It makes our work far easier to dismiss as a farrago of nonsense."
And that's the crux of the lawsuit...Dan Brown is making them look as farcical as they really are!
Michael Baigent said: "Whether our hypothesis is right or wrong is irrelevant. The fact is that this is work that we put together and spent years and years building up. . . . We are being lumped in with Dan Brown's work of fiction and that degrades the historical implication of our material. It makes our work far easier to dismiss as a farrago of nonsense."
ReplyDeleteAnd that's the crux of the lawsuit...Dan Brown is making them look as farcical as they really are!
Right on the nail, Bonnie, as usual.
ReplyDeleteI am really loving the judge! He gets better by the day. Hope he gets the biggest payout.